SaveYourself.ca helps you solve pain problems

platelet-rich plasma injection Thu Jan 14th @ 11:00am by Paul Ingraham

Platelet-rich plasma injection “no more effective than saltwater”

Well, this was probably inevitable.

Last summer a reader asked me what I think of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections — the injection of a concentrated preparation of your own blood into irritated tissue, usually a tendinitis or similar condition like iliotibial band syndrome or plantar fasciitis — to stimulate healing. I replied quite optimistically at the time:

Incredibly, I have no strong objection to PRP. This is rare! I am a grump and not easily impressed. The huge majority of therapies I get asked about strike me as mostly pointless shots in the dark. By contrast, PRP injections seem like they have a reasonable rationale, there’s a bunch of promising evidence, and they are quite unlikely to have any significant risks. Wow. Cool.

Of course, I would caution you against singing its praises: there’s a huge gap between “promising” and “proven.” If it works for you, great! But don’t promote it as a treatment that “works” — one experience means nothing. For all we know, future research will show significant problems and limitations. This is precisely what has happened with countless other therapies.

And that is precisely what just happened to PRP, only a few months later. Yesterday, the New York Times reported bad science news for platelet-rich plasma injection, and I am now once again just as unimpressed by PRP as I am by most other too-good-to-be-true treatments:

Now, though, the first rigorous study asking whether the platelet injections actually work finds they are no more effective than saltwater.

So another treatment bites the dust. I don’t want to completely dismiss a treatment like PRP just because one good study was clearly negative, but the results immediately and seriously afflict PRP with the how-good-can-it-possibly-be problem — how good can it be if it fails the best testing so far? Initially promising in many ways, PRP will now undoubtedly now be mired in years of controversy. Wait and see, check the evidence in five years: it will be a mess of contradictions and no clear answers. PRP will probably die a slow death, only beaten into submission over many years by a growing pile of underwhelming evidence, even as its proponents continue to overconfidently sell the service.

Other recent stuff …

Sep 8 links
 
Chiropractors shunned by huge insurer, Olympic injury rate, artificial turf safety, medical reporting quiz, Dilbert does placebo
Sep 3 Epsom
 
Confusing the benefits of salty and non-salty baths
Aug 28 links
 
Do-it-yourself clinical trials, homeopathic hijinks, a gorgeous e-textbook app for iPad, Lorimer Mosely on pain neurology, and a Chewbacca thing
Aug 26 exercise
 
Five stars! Micro book review of Body by Science
Aug 26 stretching
 
“I’ve tried to interpret the findings of the best physiologists and translate them into sound practices. That’s made me a radical.”
Aug 26 acupuncture
 
Backfirin’ placebos! How the placebo effect can actually make back pain worse
Aug 20 trigger points
 
A new chapter: medical factors that perpetuate pain
Aug 17 teaser
 
Kind of a big deal coming
Aug 10 humour
 
Sheldon Cooper on overconfidence
Aug 10 core strengthening
 
Two more mighty scientific blows to the credibility of “core strengthening” as a therapy for low back pain