updated 3/18/10
Contrast Hydrotherapy
How to use hot and cold water to speed healing from injuries
by Paul Ingraham, Vancouver, Canada MOREclose
Credentials and qualifications
I am a writer and retired Registered Massage Therapist (unusually well-trained for a massage therapist, a 3000-hour program). I’m almost done with a Bachelor of Health Sciences degree. I am a peer reviewer for The Natural Standard, and a copyeditor for Science-Based Medicine. My most important qualification is more than a decade of workaholic post-graduate study, clinical experience, and constant conversations with readers from around the world, including many experts who have provided countless suggestions and criticisms.
For more information, see: Who Am I to Say? More information about my qualifications, credentials and professional experiences for my readers and customers.
Credentials and qualifications
I am a writer and retired Registered Massage Therapist (unusually well-trained for a massage therapist, a 3000-hour program). I’m almost done with a Bachelor of Health Sciences degree. I am a peer reviewer for The Natural Standard, and a copyeditor for Science-Based Medicine. My most important qualification is more than a decade of workaholic post-graduate study, clinical experience, and constant conversations with readers from around the world, including many experts who have provided countless suggestions and criticisms.
For more information, see: Who Am I to Say? More information about my qualifications, credentials and professional experiences for my readers and customers.
Contrasting is a specific application of hydrotherapy (see Hydrotherapy), which may be useful in speeding the healing process from several common injuries, especially plantar fasciitis, ankle sprains, shin splints, carpal tunnel syndrome, and tennis elbow.
Contrasting, or contrast hydrotherapy, involves alternately heating and cooling a body part, or even the whole body. The major purpose of contrasting is to force your nervous and circulatory systems to adapt to the sudden changes in temperature, which is stimulatory, feels great, and probably has numerous minor benefits.1 It is a cheap and safe way to attempt to both soothe and stimulate irritated or healing tissue without overstimulating it. Experimenting with contrasting should be standard part of rehab from most musculoskeletal injuries.
Not strong medicine
Contrasting probably has minor benefits, but it’s unlikely to work any miracles. There is no reason to believe that contrasting would make a large difference in healing.
A few good scientific studies could tell us how effective contrasting actually is, but unfortunately the subject has barely ever been studied, and the small amount of research that has been done is of such poor quality that it’s basically useless.2
How and where to use contrast hydrotherapy
There are many ways to heat up and cool your body parts, and I encourage you to use your imagination and all the tools at your disposal. Here are a few examples.
- Arms are the easiest: a double sink works very well. Fill one with hot water and one with cold and move back and forth. If you only have one sink, it’s often possible to simply switch from a flow of hot water to a flow of cold, especially if it’s a deep sink.
- Lower legs are more difficult. A pair of deep buckets is a bit of work, but very effective. A removable shower nozzle is perfect.
- The thighs or hips are nearly impossible, but I’ve pulled it off using a combination of hot bath with a large bin of cold water used as a sitz bath. Feels great!
- On the body, you can use combinations of heating pads or hot towels with ice gel packs or ice cups (see Icing for Injuries, Tendinitis and Inflammation). These can also be used to good effect elsewhere.
Whatever you come up with, there are just a few rules of thumb to follow:
- Avoid contrasting the freshest injuries that are still hot, swollen, and/or red, because the heat may aggravate the inflammation more than the cooling phase can control. You should use just ice on a fresh injury (note an important exception: back pain is usually not an “injury” per se, and should not be iced). Wait about three days for an injury like an ankle sprain to calm down a bit before you start contrasting it.
- You should apply heat very thoroughly, at least a minute or as long as five minutes depending on how efficient your heating method is.
- If you stretch, stretch after the heating, obviously. If you can, stretch while you are heating. If you have to stop heating to stretch, reheat after stretching before moving on to the cold.
- Always finish every contrast session with cold. Never finish with heat!
- It is desirable (though not always practical) to increase the intensity of the contrast as you go: that is, the hot gets hotter and the cold gets colder. For instance, when I contrast my arms, I start with two sinks of regular hot and cold tap water — but for the second cycle, I dump a little boiling water into the hot, and add a tray of ice cubs to the cold! Thus the 2nd round of contrasting is much more intense.
Is the shower good enough?
To some extent you can contrast in the shower. Whole body contrasting is nice and probably healthful in some general ways, but has limited value for rehabilitating from injuries, which require more intense temperatures, more accurately applied. Immersion of the body part is always the best. Intense heating of only the arm by dipping it in hot water, for instance, tends to cause much greater capillary dilation in the arm than the hottest shower.
The hottest and coldest showers are generally just too hot and too cold to tolerate on large areas of your body … or even just from the splashing if your trying to spray just one part of your body.
A detachable shower head, however, allows you to focus the spray enough to achieve a reasonably good effect.
How much contrasting is enough contrasting?
Precision with dosage of contrasting is not particularly important. Heat and cool in roughly one-minute doses. But if you stick to the idea of “make it good and hot, and then make it good and cold” you’re doing it right. ![]()
And how many times should you cycle between hot and cold? Just a single time — one dose of hot, one dose of cold — is a minimal help. Three times is much more of a help, and is probably a good number. Six times is just tedious! There are practical considerations.
And how many times per day? Roughly once per day. More would undoubtedly be better — perhaps three times per day, for a few days, for a situation where contrasting is particularly easy and ideal for the injury — but there are usually strict practical limits on how much contrasting people can do, or should do.
It’s helpful, but it’s not so good that you should be spending half your day doing it!
This may be powerful medicine in some situations: don’t underestimate its usefulness just because it sounds a bit odd! Try it, have fun, enjoy the sensations, and you may find it more effective at helping you heal than medications or therapy.
Updates
Thursday, March 18, 2010 — Added reference to Hing.
Notes
- Boyle, Wade, and André Saine. Lectures in Naturopathic Hydrotherapy. Sandy, Oregon: Eclectic Medical Publications, 1988. Return to text.
- Hing et al. “Contrast therapy—a systematic review.” Physical Therapy in Sport. 2008. Full Abstract:
Return to text.Contrast therapy is a strategy that is widely utilised in a number of sporting codes to aid recovery. This wide use might suggest that contrast therapy is an effective recovery modality however support for this assumption appears to be mainly anecdotal. The purpose of this paper is to review the efficacy of contrast therapy. To achieve this objective, a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have specifically evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of contrast therapy was performed. A search to identify appropriate literature was conducted across a number of electronic databases. The titles and abstracts of the papers identified were reviewed to select papers specifically relating to contrast therapy. Twelve RCTs met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The PEDro Scale, a systematic tool used to critique RCTs, was employed to critique the methodological quality of these studies. This review highlights both the lack in quantity and quality of research regarding the efficacy of contrast therapy for sports recovery. There appears to be insufficient evidence that contrast therapy aids in recovery and the limited methodological quality of the reviewed studies makes it difficult to draw clear conclusions about this form of therapy. Future research needs to re-examine the use of contrast therapy and in particular whole body immersion recovery strategies within the appropriate sports setting. This research will need to be of sufficient quality to enable appropriate conclusions to be made with regards to its use as a recovery strategy.