SaveYourself.ca helps you solve pain problems

COLUMNS
Check the columns you would like to see displayed …
Rating Type Title Keywords
Quote? Author Link Notes
Abstract Vol No. Pages
Month Year Publisher
Please wait, sorting table...

Musculoskeletal Bibliography

titleInitial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration
typearticle in a journal
full texthttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmed [snip!]
  open in this window or new window
noteFrom the abstract: “Drug-placebo differences in antidepressant efficacy increase as a function of baseline severity, but are relatively small even for severely depressed patients. The relationship between initial severity and antidepressant efficacy is attributable to decreased responsiveness to placebo among very severely depressed patients, rather than to increased responsiveness to medication.” Commenting on this paper, Ars Technica notes (see Just how good are current antidepressants?) that, “These trials include not just those that were published in peer-reviewed journals, but also unpublished trials that were registered with the FDA.” This is extremely important. Although it should be obvious, it helps that New England Journal of Medicine pointed it out recently: “Evidence-based medicine is valuable to the extent that the evidence base is complete and unbiased.” Yet they reported (see Turner) that the FDA has published studies of anti-depressants when they had positive outcomes, while studies with apparently negative results were “either not published (22 studies) or published in a way that, in our opinion, conveyed a positive outcome (11 studies)”!
authorsIrving Kirsch, Brett J Deacon, Tania B Huedo-Medina, Alan Scoboria, Thomas J Moore, and Blair T Johnson
keywordsantidepressants, medications
journalPLos Medicine
year2008
volume5
number2
pagee45
abstract
BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of antidepressant medications have reported only modest benefits over placebo treatment, and when unpublished trial data are included, the benefit falls below accepted criteria for clinical significance. Yet, the efficacy of the antidepressants may also depend on the severity of initial depression scores. The purpose of this analysis is to establish the relation of baseline severity and antidepressant efficacy using a relevant dataset of published and unpublished clinical trials. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We obtained data on all clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the licensing of the four new-generation antidepressants for which full datasets were available. We then used meta-analytic techniques to assess linear and quadratic effects of initial severity on improvement scores for drug and placebo groups and on drug-placebo difference scores. Drug-placebo differences increased as a function of initial severity, rising from virtually no difference at moderate levels of initial depression to a relatively small difference for patients with very severe depression, reaching conventional criteria for clinical significance only for patients at the upper end of the very severely depressed category. Meta-regression analyses indicated that the relation of baseline severity and improvement was curvilinear in drug groups and showed a strong, negative linear component in placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Drug-placebo differences in antidepressant efficacy increase as a function of baseline severity, but are relatively small even for severely depressed patients. The relationship between initial severity and antidepressant efficacy is attributable to decreased responsiveness to placebo among very severely depressed patients, rather than to increased responsiveness to medication.
2 articles citing this recordThese 2 articles on SaveYourself.ca cite this item as a source:
SY SSRI Antidepressants Are Not Medicine
SY SSRI Anti-Depressants Looking More Like Sugar Pills Than Ever